Oklahoma’s only female prisoner sentenced to deathWhose lawyers claim that she was ‘sex ashamed’ during the murder case of her husband may get another day in court after a ruling by the Supreme Court on Tuesday.
Brenda Andrew, now 61, was sentenced to death in 2004 for the Murder of her alienated husbandRob Andries.
She was convicted of the murder in 2001, together with her lover and fellow Sunday school teacher James Pavatt. Pavatt, who had sold Rob Andrew a $ 800,000 life insurance policy, had announced that he had killed Rob with a friend. He denied that Brenda was involved.
Brenda Andrew told the police after the shooting, in which she was shot in the arm, that there were two masked men her and her husband attacked While helping her, according to judicial documents rated by Fox News Digital according to judicial documents.
Her lawyers claim that evidence about her “downright irrelevant sexual history” was not fair to use in court, where the prosecutors called her a “slut puppy” and jury members showed one of her strings, according to their court cases.
Brenda Andrew in the court in Oklahoma City in 2004. (David McDaniel/De Oklahoman)
The prosecutor said that the string was a strong proof that Andrew had killed her husband, the New York Times reported.
“The grieving widow packs this to get away with her boyfriend,” he said, holding her garment. “I can’t twist the facts, people. I can’t twist the evidence. “
Andrew had packed the underwear days after her husband’s death for a trip to Mexico. Three months after the murder, in February 2002, Andrew and Pavatt had no money anymore and, according to the newspaper, once again entered the United States, where they were arrested at the border. The two children of Andrew, who traveled with them, were placed under the custody of their father’s side grandparents.
Register to get Newsletter for true crimes
The judges of the Supreme Court wrote in their decision that the prosecutor “spent a significant amount of time on the trial” by going through details about Andrew’s sex life that had nothing to do with her. Murder of husband.
“The prosecutor has provoked testimonies about the sexual partners of Andrew who are already twenty years old; about the outfits she wore during dinner or during the shopping; about the underwear she packed for vacation; and about how often they were Sex had in her car, “the majority wrote in their decision. ‘The ultimate question is whether an honest lawyer could not agree that the evidence is’ so’ has infected the process With unfairness’, which makes the resulting conviction or conviction a ‘refusal of a fair trial’.
Idaho is increasing the fire team now that the process of Bryan Kherberger is approaching
Brenda Andrew was shown on the left in 2004 and on the right on her most recent Mugshot from 2024. (Oklahoma Ministry of Corrections)
Judge Clarence Thomas and right Neil M. Gorsuch were a different opinion about this.
“Sex and marriage were inevitable issues during the trial against Andrew, and the state introduced a variety of evidence about her sexual behavior,” Thomas wrote.
In a short call to the Supreme Court not to treat the Andrew’s case, prosecutors argued that testimonies about her appearance and sexuality “were only a drop on the glowing plate” of evidence against her. Before the ruling of the Supreme Court on Tuesday, lower courts had suggested that, although the presentation of the case was inappropriate by the prosecutors, the case against Andrew was still running.
Follow the Fox True Crime Team on X
The 10th Circuit Court of Appeals in Colorado will now assess the claims of Andrew.
Andrew’s lawyer, Ed Blau, said it Koco news 5 that it will be up to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals to determine whether evidence “with regard to the sex life of (his client)” and “with regard to its qualities as a mother … should not have been given to the jury, and whether the At the level of violating its rights to a fair trial. “
He said that Andrew could again be convicted of whether a whole new process could get on the basis of the findings of the Court of Appeal. The court could also decide that no action is needed and that Andrew should stay in the death cell.
Get real-time updates directly on the Hub for true crime
Jessica Sutton, another lawyer from Andrew, said it The Oklahoman That she hoped that the court would “stop this injustice.”
“The use of these gender -related style figures to justify a conviction and death penalty is unbearable and is a threat to anyone who does not comply with the rigid gender standards,” she told the newspaper.
Although she doubts whether the court will acquit Andrew of murder, forensic psychologist Dr. said. Carole Lieberman against Fox News Digital that she will probably get a new process.
Postman Murder Force with History of Violence indicated in a bright lunch break attack
James Pavatt is depicted on the left in a Mugshot from 2003 and on the right in a Mugshot from 2024. (Oklahoma Ministry of Corrections)
“The evidence about her role in the murder was not enough to be able to get the death penalty, so the prosecutors made use of the stereotypes of the jury members about a ‘fallen woman’ and let her despise,” Lieberman said. Was harmful than evidence … I think it was inappropriate personal hatred towards the prosecutors against her, or inappropriate personal revenge, or a personal desire to punish her more heavily instead of giving her life in prison. ‘
Click here to download the Fox News app
A panel of three judges voted in June 2017 with 2 against 1 to undo part of Pavatt’s death sentence. They found that Andrew’s husband died too quickly to be able to regard his death as ‘cruel and horrible’, an aggravating circumstance that enabled the state to pronounce him. The death penalty, that of Oklahoma City KFOR reported that.
According to the Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Andrew’s last appeal from 2008 was rejected.
