The Ministry of Justice (Doj) has submitted a written complaint about the American district judge Ana Reyes to the main judge of the United States Court of Appeal for the District of Columbia Circuit, Sri Srinivasan, after a tense case between the Trump government and two LGBTQ groups .
The letter signed by the staff chief of Attorney General Pam Bondi, Chad Mizelle, concerns the DOJ characterized as the “misconduct” of Reyes during the procedure in Nicolas Talbott et al. V. Donald J. Trump et al., A matter It is brought by two LGBTQ groups that the Trump administrations Executive orders that retain transgender individuals to serve in the US Army.
According to the complaint, the transcript reveals “Multiple cases in which the misconduct of Judge Reyes endangered the dignity of the procedure and demonstrated potential bias, thereby pronouncing serious concern about its ability to preside impartial in this issue.”
Judge provides 19 AGS for the time being against doge access to Treasury payment system
American district judge Ana Reyes is depicted with a group of protesters (Getty Images / Youtube / Senatordurbob)
During the proceedings, Judge Reyes mentioned the Executive conceptions signed by President Trump since he took office, including the recognition of only two sexes, blocking school financing by promoting the idea that gender can be liquid, so that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs can issue documents Stopping outgoing documents and withdrawing the ability of transferoral employees to receive a sex change. She also called the Trump administration to withdraw an earlier regulation with regard to transmeners with equal access to homeless shelters.
Officials push back on claims on ‘list’ of Generals Hegseeth is planning to shoot at Pentagon
The letter says that judge Reyes doj lawyer Jason Lynch asked: “What do you think Jesus would say to tell a group of people that they are so worthless … that we will not allow them in homeless shelters? Do you think you think so? Jesus would be, “sounds good to me?” Or do you think Jesus would say: “WTF?
Doj lawyers claimed that the line of interrogation “was very problematic for various reasons” -including the placement of Doj Council in an untenable position to either respond or speculate about how incoherent hypothetical coordination with the personal religious beliefs of Reyes .
President Donald Trump sits down with Fox News -anchor Bret Baier for an interview. (Fox News / Special Report)
The letter emphasized another incident in which Judge Reyes deals with a rhetorical exercise to attract parallels for transmensens who are excluded from military service. The judge instructed Doj Council: “My new standing order says that no one who graduated from the UvA Law School can appear for me. So I want you to sit down, please. I want you to sit down.”
When the lawyer met this directive, the judge continued her hypothetical with graduates from UvA Law who was banned from her courtroom because “they are all liars and miss integrity.” The letter only claimed that after Judge Reyes used the counsel as a physical prop, allowed him to continue the procedure. She then asked the lawyer if he saw how unfair the reasoning was.
The Ministry of Justice Seals can be seen during a press conference at the DOJ office in Washington, 16 May 2023. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)
Nevertheless, the DOJ claimed in his complaint that such a treatment ‘undermines the dignity of the counsel and the decorum of the courtroom’.
There were times when judge Reyes doj lawyer Jason Lynch praised and told him and the gallery that he did a credible work that argued for the government in a difficult situation.
The letter concludes that “appropriate measures are being taken to tackle these violations,” say that this issue justifies a “minimum of this issue, further investigation to determine whether these incidents represent a pattern of misconduct that more significant corrective measures required”.
Click here to get the Fox News app
American court Judges are sitting on the couch as a lifelong appointment. However, it is possible that the main judge could reprove Srinivasan judge Reyes, or possibly suggests that she will be taken back from the case.
