Three months after Blake Lively Severe accusations of sexual harassment about the set of “it ends with us”, the lawyer of Justin Baldoni has admitted that a settlement is probably not in the prediction.
High -profile procedure Bryan Freedman noted that his client “destroyed” by this was destroyed, while he broke things during a recent appearance on Matthew Belloni’s “The city“Podcast.
“How long can this take? I don’t believe there will be a process in this case,” Belloni told Freedman. “I just think the potential for the circus and the damage to both parties will eventually win and you will settle. So if that is the case, why not just settle for?”
Blake Lively vs. Justin Baldoni: Everything to know
Justin Baldoni’s lawyer claimed that the actor “was destroyed” and said that he will probably not settle against Blake Lively. (Getty Images)
Belloni added: “What is the number? What would it be to go away, just to stop?”
“You keep calling it a circus, and I get it,” Freedman said. “You see many cases. You see many things and you are doing great, but the reality is that this is not a circus if you go through such an experience.”
Freedman added: “I have represented many people in the worst moments of their career, the worst moments of their lives. Justin is destroyed by this. This is really serious, and in this time the only way you really get back, prove your innocence.”
He noticed how tests are important “to prove your innocence.”
“I have represented many people in the worst moments of their career, the worst moments of their lives. Justin has been destroyed by this.”
“And that is what we actively work on,” he said. “So that can only be done in a courtroom.”
Justin Baldoni played as Ryle Kincaid in “It ends with us.” (Gotham/GC images)
Blake Lively played as Lily Bloom in “It Ends with Us”. (Gotham)
Lively detailed accusations of sexual harassmentDrawing, intentional condition of emotional need, negligence and more made by Baldoni and film producer Jamey Heath in a complaint that was first submitted to the California Civil Rights Department on December 20 and later in the Federal Court on 31 December.
Like what you read? Click here for more entertainment news
On the same day Lively submitted her federal lawsuit, Baldoni submitted a $ 250 million lawsuit against the New York Times for an article in December on the alleged smear campaign that he tried to bump into his co-star.
“This is really serious, and in this time the only way you can really come back is to prove your innocence.”
Weeks later Baldoni then mentioned Lively and Reynolds in a separate $ 400 million defamation lawsuit In which he accused the Hollywood force of an attempt to hijack “it ends with us” and create their own story.
Lively filed a complaint against Baldoni in December after rumors about a stuffed feud about “it ends with us”. (Jose Perez/Bauer-Griffin/GC images)
In addition to releasing a website with details about the timeline of events that reported, the Baldoni team also shared unprocessed images From the set of “It ends with us.” Both lively and Baldoni have claimed the images their respective claims.
Click here to sign up for the entertainment newsletter
After the release, the Lively Team of Lively demanded that a GAG -Bevel was published against Baldoni’s lawyer.
Judge Lewis Liman responded on Thursday to Lively’s “Attorney’s Eyes Only” (AEO) request for evidence in The current caseThe granting of a changed order that is expected to “protect the confidentiality of certainly non -public and confidential material that in the case and during the discovery will be exchanged on the basis of and during the discovery”.
Liman said that the changed protective order of the court was granted because of the risk that “gossip” spread among both parties.
Justin Baldoni not only played in the film adjustment of the novel, but also directed the film. (Getty Images)
“These Involve both business competitors and accusations of sexual damage, “said Liman in his judicial order.” Discovery will necessarily include confidential and sensitive business and personal information. The risk of disclosure is great. Both the moving parties and the Wayfarer parties have accused opposing parties of providing private, sensitive or confidential information to the media for their own business and personal benefits in ways that cannot be easily traced. “
A test date has been established for March 2026.
Click here to get the Fox News app
Christina Dugan Ramirez from Fox News Digital has contributed to this report.
