The Attorney General of three States brought a lawsuit against the Trump administration on Friday for trying to ban children access to the procedures of sex change.
President Donald Trump signed one executive order At the end of January entitled “Protect children against chemical and surgical mutilation.” The goal is to limit “chemical and surgical” gender change procedures for minors.
“Throughout the country, medical professionals nowadays become a growing number of influenceable children under the radical and false claims to mutilate and sterilize that adults can change a child’s sex through a series of irreversible medical interventions,” ” The executive order mentioned. “This dangerous trend will be a stain in the history of our nation, and it must end.”
Since then, local democratic Officials throughout the country have resisted, claim that Trump is trying to deprive vulnerable American citizens of a fundamental law. Procursi -General Nick Brown from the state of Washington, Keith Ellison of Minnesota, and then Rayfield of Oregon have filed a lawsuit that tried to claim that the Order of Trump is not only “cruel”, but unconstitutional.
The Attorney General Nick Brown from Washington convicted Trump’s executive order to block transgender operations for young people.
“The order is a cruel and unfounded width against transgender youth, their families and the doctors and medical institutions that offer them this critical care. It is an official declaration of intolerance of the president This gives agencies instructed to openly discriminate against vulnerable young people based on their transgender status and sex, “read the lawsuit.” It is also a flagrant abuse of power. The order uses expenditure and legislative powers that inflict exclusively on the congress, and seizes the historical police powers of the States to regulate medical practice in violation of the tenth amendment. “
The lawsuit Also objected to the name of the executive order, with the argument that the Ter, “surgical mutilation” is “” false and repulsive “.
The lawsuit also claims that the executive command is “clearly unconstitutional” because it is “the right to equal protection that is guaranteed by the fifth amendment to the Constitution of the United States, because it stops a vulnerable group for abuse. It opts for limitation and criminalization medical treatments that confirm the gender of a patient if they are not in accordance with the sex of that patient. “
President Donald Trump signs executive orders in the Oval Office on January 20, 2025 in Washington, DC. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty images)
The lawsuit also argues that the executive order “violates the constitutional separation of powers by using the legislative powers of the congress” to claim that it violates the tenth amendment by claiming that “the president cannot unilaterally, and without any congress car it Offering safe, effective and necessary medical care “
Attorney -General Nick Brown on one press conference On Friday, Trump’s executive order called “disgusting” and “hateful”.
Click here to get the Fox News app
“The command of this president is rude, it is disgusting, it is hateful, so we will always take action against illegal behavior. But this has special resonance because of the hatred behind it,” he said. “It promotes intimidation and discrimination of people who are already marginalized. It risks their literal health and safety and their suppliers. We ask for a temporarily limiting order to immediately stop the damage that is done because this is an emergency.”
