In his first week as president has president Donald Trump Has taken a series of executive actions, which fulfilled an important campaign blood to challenge ‘gender ideology’ in American institutions and to promote the ‘biological truth’ that is rooted in the ‘fundamental and irrefutable reality’.
In the meantime, The Supreme Court It is about to rule this year in two important gender -related matters, and Trump’s new executive action could cause further controversy at the higher court.
Last week Scotus agreed to hear Mahmoud v. Taylor, in which it would be determined whether schools can force teachers to read LGBTQ books to children of primary school age, despite objections from parents. The question is whether parents will have the right to abandon their children from such instructions.
“If the Supreme Court does its job, this should not affect the decisions in the case,” said Sarah Marshall Perry, senior legal assistant of the Heritage Foundation, in an interview to Fox News Digital. “What the executive order of Trump was is a statement of what the policy will be for managers in the new government. And he did exactly what (former President Joe) Biden did with his executive order to expand sex with gender identity. . “
Trump draws tens of executive orders, which fulfill a lot but not all campaign blows
An LGBT demonstration outside the Supreme Court; President Donald Trump, commitment, signs implementing decisions. (Getty images)
Perry noticed the separation of powers between the executive and the judiciary, and added that although the executive power is largely a political entity, the judiciary is non-political.
Scotus will be obliged to concentrate exclusively on the facts that have been raised in the cases pending for them, she said, and who will “include questions with regard to the parameters of parental rights guidelines at school curricula and what exactly the curriculum means with In view of opt-out, or gender medicine and age and medical-based limitations that influence persons who are transgender, are a violation of the law Equal protection clause. ”
She also pointed out that the executive order should not influence the decision -making of the Supreme Court, and added: “The executive order should absolutely no influence on what the Supreme Court decides in the future.”
Pro-life activist persecuted by Biden Doj responds to Trump Pardon: “I want to give him a hug”
Protesters gather outside the building of the Supreme Court while judges hear oral arguments in Washington, DC (Jack Gruber/US today)
In another case in which pleasure in last year, Skrmetti against the US, the Higher Court of Appeal or the Clause regarding equal protection, which guarantees equal treatment under the law for individuals in comparable circumstances, prevents medical healthcare providers from prohibiting puberty blockers and Hormone treatments for children who are looking for transgender surgical procedures.
The Bides government joined the court case by submitting a petition to the Supreme Court in November 2023.
‘I think the American people are happy that they have a president who has common sense, who recognizes biological reality, who recognizes the text of the civil rights law and the rule of law itself, and now they are going to say that we have done that. Someone who was willing to jump in the breach for us, also through the Ministry of Justice, when things come all the way to the Supreme Court, “said Perry. “But parents must be involved, and I think that will happen to be able to take on more legal challenges.”
Pro-Life Protesters given by Trump, Fox confirms
Activists for and against trans -rights protest outside the US Supreme Court before the start of the United States case against Skrmetti on December 4, 2024. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)
‘I think these elections are really changing, not only at a political level, but also at the philosophical just for many people, because we acknowledge that America has withdrawn somewhat from the dangerous border when it comes to understanding what it meant To be husband and female. Even understanding what it meant to live in a pluralistic society in a pluralistic society, “said Perry. “We now see, I think, luckily a rebirth of those long -standing, useful ideas.”
The executive command of Trump, Signed on the inauguration day and entitled: “Defending Women from gender ideology extremism and restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government”, explains that the US will only recognize two sexes – male and female – based on unchanging biological characteristics.
Click here to download the Fox News app
It prohibits the use of gender identity in legal and administrative contexts and mandatory federal authorities, including those who supervise housing, prisons and education, to adhere to this definition when maintaining laws and the issuing of regulations. The order regulates changes in identity documents issued by the government, prohibits promoting ‘gender ideology’ in federal programs, revokes previous executive actions that promoted and instructs gender identity integration to eliminate federal authorities to eliminate guidelines or regulations that are contrary to the new policy .
The executive order of Trump revokes the executive order of the Biden government entitled ‘Preventing and combating discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation’, signed in 2021, in which federal authorities were assigned to interpret and enforce To ban discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation. Orientation.
